Question

Hi

I have dozens of FMB204 working properly with old FW 03.10.08.

In the last week, I have updated to the newest FW 03.18.16 and some devices are not sending the Data to the server.

Well...they are sending data but with an incorrect format. I have used the Codec 8, of course, in both cases.

I can see if Ask for GETVER a peculiar Data: 

Some FM´s has "HW:FMB204 Mod:9" with FW 03.18.16 and this Mod: ? is changed with the Old FW 03.10.08 to "HW:FMB204 Mod:8"

Model 9.... Model 8  What is this?

Another one devices has "model 5" with both FW´s 

Could someone help me??

Thanks a lot

 

Answer 1

Hello.

static const sDeviceFeatures_t FMB2_MOD5 = {     5,     2,     eHW_SIM_Single              ,     eHW_IO_Din3Dout2Ain1        ,     eHW_Bat_LiPo_AME2056_210mA  ,     eHW_CAN_None                ,     eHW_1WIRE_Normal            ,     eHW_EXTUART_None            ,     eHW_NTC_Present             ,     eHW_EXTSTOR_NAND            , };

/* 17 pos. FMB202_20 Ni-Mh, Nand, noWD */ static const sDeviceFeatures_t FMB2_MOD8 = {     8,     1,     eHW_SIM_Single              ,     eHW_IO_Din3Dout2Ain1        ,     eHW_Bat_NiMh                ,     eHW_CAN_None                ,     eHW_1WIRE_Normal            ,     eHW_EXTUART_None            ,     eHW_NTC_Present             ,     eHW_EXTSTOR_NAND            , };

/* 18 pos. FMB204_20 LiPo, Nand, noWD */ static const sDeviceFeatures_t FMB2_MOD9 = {     9,     2,     eHW_SIM_Single              ,     eHW_IO_Din3Dout2Ain1        ,     eHW_Bat_LiPo_AME2056_210mA  ,     eHW_CAN_None                ,     eHW_1WIRE_Normal            ,     eHW_EXTUART_None            ,     eHW_NTC_Present             ,     eHW_EXTSTOR_NAND            , };

The MOD is modification. As you can see the differences between 5/8/9 - are:

5/9 - both have lipo battery with AME charger (basically they are identical, but 5 is older model and it probably had watchdog chip which later was removed from later modifications as unnecessary).

8 - nimh bat

all other parameters between these modifications 5/8/9 - are the same.

"Well...they are sending data but with an incorrect format."

How do you verify that they are sending data in incorrect format?
What is incorrect about their format?
What is this incorrect format? maybe they are really configured with codec8 extended?

Regards

Comments

Thanks

The most strange is that FMB devices Channges the MOD9 to MOD8 if I make FW Upgrade:

The same device:

 FW Ver:03.18.16_00  HW:FMB204 Mod:9 IMEI .....

FW Ver:03.10.08_00  HW:FMB204 Mod:8 IMEI

About "incorrect format" we can  see in our LOG (in our AVL platform):

28/01/2019 17:36:35.421 Device 1371. Codec 8 (08) 28/01/2019 17:36:35.421 Device 1371. CRC Incorrecto. Ini:0 Size:1251  Datos:  00 00 00 00 E3 04 00 00 08 20 00 00 01 68 95 50 EF C0 00 FE 5F B0 28 19 E1 69 FD 00 38 00 DF 0F 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 31 01 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 4E 30 A0 00 FE 5F B6 FE 19 E1 71 05 00 38 00 1F 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 31 02 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 4B 71 80 00 FE 5F B6 FE 19 E1 71 05 00 38 00 1F 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 31 04 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 48 B2 60 00 FE 5F B6 FE 19 E1 71 05 00 38 00 1F 14 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FF 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 45 F3 40 00 FE 5F B3 AC 19 E1 6D 0C 00 41 00 24 10 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 43 34 20 00 FE 5F B3 AC 19 E1 6D 0C 00 41 00 24 10 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FC 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 40 75 00 00 FE 5F B2 2D 19 E1 69 BA 00 47 00 D0 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 3D B5 E0 00 FE 5F B2 2D 19 E1 69 BA 00 47 00 D0 10 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 3A F6 C0 00 FE 5F B2 2D 19 E1 69 BA 00 47 00 D0 0F 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 38 37 A0 00 FE 5F B2 2D 19 E1 69 BA 00 47 00 D0 0F 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 35 78 80 00 FE 5F B5 8F 19 E1 6D A2 00 46 00 0E 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 32 B9 60 00 FE 5F B2 3D 19 E1 6A F7 00 47 00 CA 0F 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 2F FA 40 00 FE 5F B2 3D 19 E1 6A F7 00 47 00 CA 0F 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 2D 3B 20 00 FE 5F B2 3D 19 E1 6A F7 00 47 00 CA 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 2A 7C 00 00 FE 5F B4 74 19 E1 6D B3 00 46 00 23 10 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FF 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 27 BC E0 00 FE 5F B3 26 19 E1 6A 2F 00 50 00 C6 12 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 24 FD C0 00 FE 5F B3 26 19 E1 6A 2F 00 50 00 C6 0E 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 22 3E A0 00 FE 5F B3 26 19 E1 6A 2F 00 50 00 C6 12 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 1F 7F 80 00 FE 5F B3 26 19 E1 6A 2F 00 50 00 C6 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FC 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 1C C0 60 00 FE 5F B5 5D 19 E1 6D 81 00 53 00 13 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 1A 01 40 00 FE 5F B5 5D 19 E1 6D 81 00 53 00 13 10 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 17 42 20 00 FE 5F B1 A7 19 E1 6F B8 00 56 00 1A 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 14 83 00 00 FE 5F B1 A7 19 E1 6F B8 00 56 00 1A 0E 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FF 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 11 C3 E0 00 FE 5F AE 76 19 E1 6C DA 00 60 00 CB 10 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FE 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 0F 04 C0 00 FE 5F AF 4F 19 E1 70 90 00 64 00 F6 10 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FD 00 00 00 00 01 68 95 0C 45 A0 00 FE 5F B0 DF 19 E1 71 26 00 62 00 F7 11 00 00 00 04 03 01 00 02 00 03 00 01 42 30 FC 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

Could be bacuse we don´t use data control for  "file dl resp:OK"  and ""file dl req:..." command.??